Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486719)	6/10/2009 5:03:22 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572359

Do you think sexual fetishes have nothing to do with sexuality? They have to do with sex. Do you think sex has anything to do with sexuality? Yes, but its not a requirement.....rather, its a manifestation of one's sexuality but it doesn't need to be expressed to have a sexuality. All fetishes....just like people who are turned on by feet, legs, breasts, other body parts, hair etc. Other body parts - you realize that includes the body parts gay people like? Is your position that gay people liking certain body parts isn't a matter of their sexuality? No more so than straights or bi sexuals. But like straights then. I guess.........but what's you point? I still am trying to figure out if you think anything people will do sexually is weird - since homosex isn't, you say, why aren't other unusual sexual preferences? Stop trying to dodge by putting a "fetish" label on the stuff you know is weird and claiming its not a matter of sexuality. If we can classify gay sex under "sexuality" we could classify sadism and masochism under "sexuality" too. S&M is a form of gratification that can be sexual or non sexual. Its not considered sexuality. ----------------------------------------------- What does bother me is liberals plans to get schools and governments into encouraging some sexual expressions based on which form of deviancy is currrently fashionable with liberals. Homosexuality is a not deviancy......except in your little and limited mind. Which gets back to what you're willing to admit is deviant. If homosex isn't deviant, is S&M, bestiality, etc? I don't know about S&M.....it seems to be quite common. On the other hand, I believe bestiality is fairly rare so I suspect that would be classified as deviant behavior. I am not an authority on sexual issues. Your prudish reactions to the question being asked speak the truth you won't admit. Huh? Not knowing the answer does not make me a prude. Thats not what schools are for. Liberals should keep schools and government out of everyone's bedrooms. Hey, dude, its wingers who like going into the bedrooms, not liberals. In what way? There is no move to make homosex illegal anywhere in the US. But there are liberal moves to discuss what gays do in bed in classrooms. Its clearly liberals trying to bring gays bedrooms into the classroom. You need to check the sex laws in red states vs blue states. There are differences.