Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (24815)	6/11/2009 10:19:50 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Luckily there is a lot more CO2 for the wheat which does grow. After a century of increasing CO2, the actual planetary warming is near zero. Not even 1 degree Celsius. The test of a scientific theory is that it produces predicted results. The predicted result of CO2 concentration increase was heating. It is not hotter. Ipso facto, the theory is bung and it's back to the drawing board. The theory of Global Warming is so simplistic it's a joke. Apparently it didn't even include cloud and deep ocean currents. I wonder if it included snow cover and desert cover and chlorophyll cover. Those are the actual drivers of climate, not a piffling amount of CO2. As Al Gore said, Global Warming is a religion. He said it's a matter of spiritual and moral belief. I prefer theory and science, causal relationships and economics. He is doing financially very well from his acolytes, as High Priests do with their religions. Mqurice