Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (6431)	10/28/1997 11:45:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

Pete, if my theory is right and IF liquidity is the problem, we will turn-around and lose 300 easy at the close. Fingers crossed. -Mohan

To: MythMan who wrote (6431)	10/28/1997 11:48:00 AM
From: Joseph G.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Pete, <<somebody is making (or losing) alot of money >> Both, perhaps. But the question, are they gonna keep it? Fraid not. Joe

To: MythMan who wrote (6431)	10/28/1997 12:07:00 PM
From: IceShark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Pete, with all the bouncing around today, somebody is making (or losing) alot of money Just heard on CNBS that they talked to ML and Smith Baloney and the brokers are saying the markets are so fast and overloaded that they can't confirm order fills - even after 3 hours! Sounds like a great way for specialists and MM's to make money - imagine being told "we are sure you got filled on your DELL order somewhere between 73 1/4 and 89. We can probablly let you know tomorrow." -g- Now that's going to make people real comfortable with market efficiency. At least they can get through to their full service brokers, unlike yours truly. Regards, Dan