SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)6/15/2009 12:38:49 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson

Family remembers man killed in Mountie crash

The grief-stricken family of a south Delta man, killed when his motorcycle collided with a Jeep driven by an off-duty Mountie, remembered him yesterday as a nature lover who was fiercely loyal to his family.

The grief-stricken family of a south Delta man, killed when his motorcycle collided with a Jeep driven by an off-duty Mountie, remembered him yesterday as a nature lover who was fiercely loyal to his family.

Orion Hutchinson, 21, died Saturday of injuries sustained during the crash near the intersection of Sixth Avenue and Gilchrist Drive in Tsawwassen.

Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson is being investigated in relation to the accident. He is one of four officers who was at Vancouver International Airport when Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski died after being Tasered.

Reading from a statement prepared by Hutchinson's mother and sister, his grandmother, Faye Daly, told reporters during an emotional press conference at Delta police station that Hutchinson had a strong affinity to nature and classical music.

"He loved everything from spider's webs to rainforests," she said, her words meeting with tears from Hutchinson's mother Judith and sister Daria.

"He would . . . demand that we share his boundless fascination and admiration for the planet that we live on," she said.

Daly said Hutchinson was an "incredible athlete," an avid reader, and "deep thinker" who dreamed of travelling to Egypt.

He also showed deep devotion to those he loved.

"He would champion them to the death," she said.

Police, meanwhile, offered few new details of the investigation.

Jim Cessford of Delta police said to ensure the integrity of the investigation, further information would not be released.

Robinson, who has not been identified by police, has not been charged. He was released from custody on a promise to appear after failing a breathalyzer test. He is scheduled to appear in Surrey Provincial Court Jan. 15, 2008.

In their statement, the Hutchinson family expressed thanks for the support they've received from the Delta police and the larger community.

canada.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)6/15/2009 10:34:37 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Accused in lesbian axe-murder trial acquitted

Jury finds 24-year-old woman not guilty of first degree murder in death of her female lover's long-time boyfriend

"Timothy Appleby

From Friday's Globe and Mail, Thursday, Jun. 04, 2009 10:29PM EDT

Amid a torrent of emotion, a Toronto woman accused of using an axe to bludgeon to death her lesbian lover's possessive boyfriend walked free from a downtown courtroom yesterday afternoon, acquitted of first-degree murder.

The verdict from the seven-woman, five-man jury capped more than three days of tense deliberations.

Ashleigh Pechaluk, 24, and her parents embraced tearfully before stepping out into the bright sunshine to face a bank of microphones and television cameras.

Arrested the day of the murder, she spent more than two and a half years in custody.

But both she and her mother, Beverley Salton, said yesterday they never doubted the outcome and praised the skills and compassion of defence lawyers Peter Zaduk and Kristine Connidis.

“That's what got me through,” Ms. Pechaluk told the media throng.

“It's been a long time – hard, stressful, not knowing what's going to happen, and there was always that bit of doubt,” she said. “But I always knew it was going to be okay.”

She had pleaded not guilty in the Oct. 27, 2006 slaying of Dennis Hoy, a 36-year-old GO Transit constable and long-time boyfriend of her former lover, Nicola (Nicky) Puddicombe.

Ms. Puddicombe is set to stand trial beginning Monday. She too is charged with first-degree murder in Mr. Hoy's death.

During Ms. Pechaluk's two-month trial, the prosecution alleged the two women killed Mr. Hoy so they could be together.

He was found bludgeoned to death by an axe in Ms. Puddicombe's bed in the Queensway apartment shared by the two accused.

The jury also heard that Ms. Puddicombe, now 36, was the sole beneficiary of Mr. Hoy's $238,200 life insurance policy and his pension proceeds, and that she had convinced Ms. Pechaluk that Mr. Hoy was a high-ranking member of the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, a killer and a drug dealer.

The jury began deliberating Monday afternoon, after Madam Justice Mary Lou Benotto gave them her final instructions.

“[Ms.] Puddicombe had Ashleigh Pechaluk believing she [Ms. Puddicombe] was being forced to have sex with Dennis Hoy,” Judge Benotto said in outlining the case presented by lead prosecutor Maureen Bellmore.

“She wanted to pump up Ashleigh into a frenzy of hate, so that she could kill Dennis Hoy.”

But after deliberations punctuated by a temporary impasse, when they returned to court to tell the judge they were deadlocked and were urged to go back and try again, the jurors concluded otherwise.

In doing so they accepted Mr. Zaduk's contention that although his client had talked with friends about getting rid of Mr. Hoy, even in the last days before his death, she never went through with the plan.

The Crown's case against Ms. Pechaluk was almost entirely circumstantial. The gory crime scene yielded no physical evidence against her: no blood traces, no fingerprints, no DNA.

And also central to the verdict, in all likelihood, was Ms. Pechaluk's decision to testify on her own behalf, which she did for close to three days.

Wary of the rigours of cross-examination by the prosecution, defendants in murder trials rarely take the witness stand. But Ms. Pechaluk remained calm and articulate, turning in a performance that observers found compelling.

“I just answered the questions as best I could,” she said yesterday. “I wasn't really aware of anyone else in the room. You just try and get through it.”

The stakes in the trial could scarcely have been higher.

Conviction for first-degree murder carries an automatic penalty of life imprisonment with little chance of parole for 25 years.

But Mr. Zaduk said yesterday he was certain all along his client was innocent.

“There's not a fibre of her being that made her capable of this [murder].”

He conceded it was a bad moment when the jury returned to the courtroom on Wednesday and announced that it was unable to reach a verdict, which under Canadian law must be unanimous.

“That really rips you, you have the sense that you have to go through all this again. I'm just really glad that justice prevailed in the end.”

Ms. Salton and Ms. Pechaluk's stepfather, Keith St. John, attended the trial every day, seated in the left front row of the spectators' gallery.

Since their daughter's arrest, that was about as close as they had got.

“I haven't touched her in two years and seven months,” Ms. Salton said after the verdict.

The moment when the jury pronounced Ms . Pechaluk not guilty “was amazing,” Ms. Salton said, giving her daughter another hug.

“ I never, ever doubted this would happen but it was more wonderful than I thought.”

As for Ms. Puddicombe's trial, which will be prefaced next week by legal arguments, “We'll deal with that, we're not thinking about that right now,” Ms. Pechaluk said.

“She'll have a fair trial.”

She also commiserated with Mr. Hoy's parents, who were estranged from their son, did not attend his funeral and only occasionally visited the trial.

“I'm sorry for their loss,” she said. “It's not fair.”

Her first post-custody pleasure?

“Seafood,” she said with a laugh.

Beyond that, she said her future will encompass working with children.

“It's a new slate, starting again, this is over for me now and I want to get on with my life,” she said.

And in the embrace of her beaming parents, still pursued by the cameras, she walked quickly away."

theglobeandmail.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)6/21/2009 11:29:03 PM
From: average joe2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Monties in Tasering should face prosecution

Damning e-mail suggests the four Monties commited perjury and that senior officers sat silent while they did



The Braidwood Inquiry into the Taser-related death of Robert Dziekanski has been blown up and left in ruins by the revelation a key RCMP e-mail was withheld from the commission.

After months of outrage about the conduct of the four Mounties who responded to Vancouver Airport Oct. 14, 2007, who can believe that at the last minute, a federal lawyer would produce what many would consider a smoking gun -- an e-mail saying the officers decided to use the Taser before confronting the Polish immigrant?

If true, the Nov. 5, 2007, e-mail titled "Media strategy -- release of the YVR video," from RCMP Chief Supt. Dick Bent to assistant commissioner Al McIntyre, establishes the four have been lying through their teeth.

This critical document suggests the four officers committed perjury and that senior officers sat silent while they did so. Worse, it seems there are many other documents that have not been turned over that may be relevant.

This e-mail was one of 260 documents on a CD sent by the RCMP to the justice department last April, yet the federal lawyers didn't open the CD until last week.

Last week? Evidence delivered in April didn't get opened until last week?

What?

Helen Roberts had every reason to be in tears Friday as she apologized to the public inquiry into Dziekanski's death for failing to disclose what appears to be not just germane but also startlingly important evidence.

If Roberts had cried over Dziekanski mother's pain, I would be moved -- but a veteran lawyer wet-eyed over another screw-up in this case? I think they were crocodile tears.

Commissioner William Elliott's carefully parsed press release was equally unbelievable: "This was simply an oversight. Unfortunately in an exercise of this magnitude, such an oversight can occur."

Bollocks. No one but a moron overlooks the import of an e-mail like this.

The officers deny the explosive content is true and Roberts says Bent was wrong in what he said. But their protestations ring hollow after almost 18 months of bluster and denial. So does Elliott's threadbare these-things-happen excuse.

The situation is as bad as the most virulent critics of the Mounties feared. This is no longer about four officers who made mistakes in judgment: It's about an organization that thinks it is above the law.

"I find this delay in disclosing it to the commission appalling," an upset Braidwood said. "The contents of this e-mail goes to the heart of this inquiry's work."

Exactly.

Braidwood says his inquiry will resume on Sept. 22 after commission lawyers have time to review the e-mail, conduct an investigation and perhaps call the senior Mounties to testify about the document.

I think not.

There was a time when I thought Oct. 14, 2007 was the day that would live in the annals of RCMP infamy, but June 19, 2009 has eclipsed the tragedy of Dziekanski's death.

On Friday, a country's faith in a once proud, once revered institution died.

We have left the realm of how to regulate Taser use and the circumstances of Dziekanski's death and entered the world of criminal conduct -- which is beyond Braidwood's provincially rooted authority to investigate.

If we needed any prod to reopen the decision not to prosecute these officers, we now have been given it.

It is time to thank commissioner Braidwood for his excellent work in bringing these unsettling facts to light and it's time to appoint a special prosecutor.

The B.C. Law Society should also begin an investigation into the conduct of Roberts and any other federal lawyer involved in this staggering lack of disclosure.

That was not an "oversight." It was professional incompetence or a cover-up.

imulgrew@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)9/14/2009 1:11:34 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Robert Dziekanski Taser incident Wikipedia

Robert Dziekanski Taser incident

Location Vancouver International Airport,
Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.

Robert Dziekanski (April 15, 1967–October 14, 2007; was a Polish immigrant to Canada who died on October 14, 2007 after being tasered five times by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) at Vancouver International Airport.

Full details of the incident came to light because it was filmed by a member of the public, Paul Pritchard. The police initially took possession of the video, refusing to return it to Pritchard. Pritchard went to court to obtain it, then released it to the press.

As of May 2009, the Braidwood Inquiry is underway, with public questioning and testimony of individuals involved in the incident.

On June 20, 2009, the proceedings were suspended until September, after it was discovered that an e-mail contained information indicating that the RCMP officers had already determined that they would use tasers even before encountering Dziekanski. This contradicts the officers' testimony that they only decided upon the use of tasers at the last minute.


Robert Dziekanski was a construction worker by trade, but had also worked as a miner. He was in the process of emigrating from Gliwice, Poland to live with his mother, Zofia Cisowski, in Kamloops, British Columbia.

Dziekanski's flight was two hours late, and arrived at about 3:15 pm on October 13, 2007. According to official sources, Dziekanski required language support to complete initial customs formalities. After he completed initial immigration processing, his whereabouts between 4:00 p.m. and about 10:45 p.m. remain unclear, though at various points he was seen around the baggage carrousels. Dziekanski's mother, Zofia Cisowski, had told him to wait for her at the baggage claim area but it was a secured area where she was not allowed to enter. At 10:45 p.m., when he attempted to leave the Customs hall, he was directed again to secondary immigration as his visa had not yet been processed. Dziekanski's immigration procedures were completed at about 12:15 a.m. on October 14th.

After 30 minutes in an immigration waiting area, he was taken to the international arrivals reception area. Cisowski had been making enquiries of airport staff since the early afternoon, but could not provide information about the airline, flight number or scheduled arrival time. Airport staff told her Dziekanski was not at the airport and she had returned to Kamloops at about 10 p.m., believing her son had missed his flight.

When Dziekanski left the Customs hall, he became visibly agitated. Bystanders and airport security guards were unable to communicate with him because he did not speak English and they did not use the airport's telephone translation service.He used chairs to prop open the one-way doors between a Customs clearing area and a public lounge and at one point threw a computer and a small table to the floor before the police arrived.

Four RCMP officers, Constables Gerry Rundel, Bill Bently, Kwesi Millington, and supervisor Corporal Benjamin Robinson, arrived and entered the Customs room where Dziekanski was pacing about. They apparently directed him to stand near a counter, to which Dziekanski complied but picked up a stapler sometime after being told to place his hands on a counter. Shortly thereafter, about 25 seconds after arriving at the scene, Corporal Robinson ordered the Taser to be used. Constable Millington tasered Dziekanski. He began to convulse and was tasered several more times after falling to the ground, where the four officers pinned, handcuffed and continued to taser him. One eyewitness, who recorded the incident on her cellphone, told CBC News that Dziekanski had been tasered four times. "The third and fourth ones were at the same time" delivered by the officers at Dziekanski's right and left, just before Dziekanski fell. According to B.C. Crown counsel spokesman Stan Lowe, Dziekanski was tasered a total of five times. Constable Millington testified that he deployed the Taser four times, but he believed that in some of those instances the probes may not have contacted Dziekanski's body. Dziekanski writhed and screamed before he stopped moving. Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson stated he then checked for a pulse, but his heart had stopped. Testimony from the other RCMP officers state they never saw anyone including Robinson check for a pulse. Dziekanski did not receive CPR until paramedics arrived on the scene approximately 15 minutes later. They were unable to revive him and pronounced him dead at the scene.

October 14, 2007: Screenshot from video taken by Paul Pritchard showing Robert Dziekanski shortly after being tasered by RCMP officers at Vancouver airport.The entire event was recorded by Paul Pritchard, another traveler who was at the airport. Pritchard handed his camera and the video to police who told him that they would return the video within 48 hours. Instead, they returned the camera with a new memory card and kept the original with the video, stating that they would not release it in order to preserve the integrity of the investigation. They claimed that witness statements would be tainted if they viewed the video before being interviewed by police. Pritchard went to court to obtain the video, which he then released to the media on November 14, 2007; three television outlets paid fees to Pritchard for the right to broadcast the video. After the video was made available, an RCMP spokesperson cautioned the public to reserve judgment against the police because the video represents "just one piece of evidence, one person's view."

Before the video was released to the public, the RCMP repeatedly claimed that only three officers were at the scene. There were actually four officers at the scene. The RCMP also said that they did not use pepper spray because of the risk it would have posed to bystanders. The video, however, suggests the incident occurred in an area separated from bystanders by a glass wall. An RCMP spokesperson also stated that batons were not used, which was also contradicted by the video.

The RCMP officers involved in the Dziekanski death have been widely criticized for their handling of the incident. A retired Vancouver Police superintendent commented after viewing the video that Dziekanski did not appear to be making "any threatening gestures" towards the police and he did not see why it became a police incident. Particularly contentious is that the RCMP officers made no attempt to defuse or gain control of the situation before resorting to the Taser.

It is noteworthy that in August 2007, before Dziekanski's death, RCMP changed its protocol on Taser use, suggesting that multiple Taser shocks may be recommendable under certain circumstances.

The RCMP's handling of the incident has led to charges that they misrepresented the facts in order to portray the RCMP in a favourable light. The BC Civil Liberties Association has filed a complaint arguing that the evidence shows that the Taser was not used as a last resort and condemning the RCMP for its attempt to suppress the video and for casting aspersions on the character of Dziekanski. An RCMP spokesman, Sgt. Pierre Lemaitre, was heavily criticized for providing a false version of events prior to the public release of the video. He stated that Dziekanski "continued to throw things around and yell and scream", after the arrival of the police officers, which was later revealed by the video to be false.

On December 12, 2008, the Criminal Justice Branch of British Columbia issued a statement, finding that although the RCMP officers' efforts to restrain Dziekanski were a contributing cause of his death, the force they used to subdue and restrain him was reasonable and necessary in all the circumstances; thus there would not be a substantial likelihood of conviction of the officers in connection with the incident and accordingly criminal charges were not approved. Three of the officers remain on duty elsewhere in Canada, while the supervisor, Corporal Benjamin Monty Robinson, is suspended with pay awaiting trial on charges of impaired driving causing death which resulted in the death of a 21-year old Vancouver man.

The officers have been subject to public criticism, both in the media and in formal proceedings before the Braidwood Commission of Inquiry. The officers were served notices of misconduct by the commission forewarning them the commissioner may include a finding of misconduct its final report. The warnings allege specific but overlapping grounds for each of the four. The collective allegations are that they failed to properly assess and respond to the circumstances in which they found Mr. Dziekanski. They repeatedly deployed the taser without justification and separately failed to adequately reassess the situation before further deploying it. The notices allege that afterwards they misrepresented facts in notes and statements, furthered the misrepresenting before the commission and provided further misleading information about other evidence before the commission. The four officers each sought judicial review to prevent the commission from making findings based on the notices. The petitions were dismissed but at least two officers are appealing.

The airport has also been criticized over the incident, particularly regarding security cameras that were not functioning, no translation services available for communicating with non-English speakers, the airport supervisor's failure to call the airport's own paramedics resulting in a twelve-minute wait for city paramedics to arrive, and for staff not helping Dziekanski's mother locate her son.

Airport security has been roundly criticized for not assisting Dziekanski during his many hours in the airport. Once he became agitated, security guards made little attempt to communicate with him or defuse the situation.

The Canada Border Services Agency reported it is reviewing its procedures at airports.

The incident has had significant coverage in Poland. The Polish consul general demanded answers about Dziekanski’s death. Canada's ambassador in Poland was invited to discuss the incident with officials in Warsaw, and one Polish official stated in the weeks after the incident that "we want the matter clarified and we want those guilty named and punished."

On December 12, 2008 the Polish embassy in Ottawa issued a statement stating that the Crown's decision not to charge the RCMP officers was "most disappointing".

In February 2009 it was reported that Canada had unilaterally suspended its mutual legal assistance treaty with Poland, thus blocking Poland's own investigation of the Dziekanski Taser incident.

Stéphane Dion, the former Liberal opposition leader, has asked the RCMP to review its Taser-use policies.

Canada's Public Safety Minister, Stockwell Day, said that he has asked the RCMP for a review on Taser use and that a report is being prepared, and pointed out that several investigations of the incident are already underway. Liberal Public Safety Critic Ujjal Dosanjh said that what was needed was an independent body to conduct a national and public review of the issue in order to develop national guidelines for Taser use by law enforcement officers. BC NDP Public Safety Critic and Port Coquitlam MLA Mike Farnworth called for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate the incident, citing concerns of police investigating themselves.

The response from law enforcement has been mixed. Law enforcement professionals have featured prominently in the media criticizing the RCMP’s handling of the situation and the aftermath. The Ottawa Police, the first Ontario police force to adopt the Taser, held a Taser demonstration for reporters in order to illustrate their safety. Both the Toronto Police and the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary, meanwhile, have put large orders of Tasers for their front-line officers on hold.

The Braidwood Inquiry was established by the Provincial Government of British Columbia and headed by retired Court of Appeal of British Columbia and Court of Appeal of the Yukon Territory Justice The Honourable Thomas R. Braidwood, Q.C. to "inquire into and report on the use of conducted energy weapons" and to "inquire into and report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski." After two delays, the Braidwood Commission began proceedings on January 19, 2009, investigating the circumstances surrounding Dziekanski's death. Commission counsel Art Vertlieb said that the involved RCMP officers, Constable Millington, Constable Bentley, Constable Rundel, and Corporal Robinson, will be summoned to appear before the inquiry and could face findings of misconduct. Constable Gerry Rundel and Constable Bill Bentley testified at the Inquiry the week of February 23, 2009 and Constable Kwesi Millington testified there the following week. The fourth and commanding RCMP officer, Corporal Benjamin Robinson, testified beginning March 23, 2009.

en.wikipedia.org



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)9/23/2009 4:13:30 AM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Head of RCMP's taser probe warns of 'unwinnable' image woes

The optics of police investigating themselves in such cases as the death of Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski presents an "unwinnable" image problem, the officer in charge of the investigation into the Dziekanski case says.

RCMP Superintendent Wayne Rideout yesterday told the Braidwood inquiry into Mr. Dziekanski's death in October, 2007, that police conduct "very competent and thorough" investigations through the Integrated Homicide Investigation Team he formerly led.

But the image issue is daunting and could only be resolved by reforms that might involve some B.C. version of the Special Investigations Unit employed in Ontario, an agency that operates independent of police to investigate cases of serious injury or death involving police and civilians.


"My preference would be homicide investigators conduct homicides, and that a separate body conducts investigations of police incidents because I think that prevents people like the IHIT team from finding themselves in these unwinnable perception problems," Supt. Rideout told the inquiry.

The line of thought seemed to pique the interest of inquiry head Thomas Braidwood, a retired appeal-court justice, who asked where the necessary expertise to conduct investigations would come from if not from the usual investigators.

"I have given it considerable thought," Supt. Rideout said. "There are hybrid models that exist where there are accommodations of police investigators, civilian oversight. Perhaps that is a workable model."

After an extensive investigation that included a trip to Poland led by Supt. Rideout, IHIT submitted a file on the case to the Crown, which eventually concluded that charges were not warranted against the four Mounties involved in the October, 2007 confrontation with Mr. Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport.

Mr. Dziekanski died of cardiac arrest after a struggle in which he was tasered five times. The use of the taser has not been linked to his death, but its application has prompted a furious debate about the police use of stun guns.

Supt. Rideout's comments came as he was called to testify yesterday on an e-mail disclosed this past June that forced a temporary halt to the inquiry because it laid out a scenario at odds with the testimony of the four Mounties.

Chief Superintendent Dick Bent wrote in the Nov. 5, 2007, e-mail to Assistant Commissioner Al MacIntyre that Supt. Rideout had said four officers went into the situation planning to taser Mr. Dziekanski.

Supt. Rideout bluntly rejected the suggestion in testimony that came hours after Supt. Bent said the comments were true, as far as he knew, at the time that he wrote them. However, Supt. Bent conceded he had no notes to back them up, and was not aware of any follow up on the matter. Under questioning, he said it did not become an issue until it was disclosed in June.

Supt. Rideout said his superior's comments were inaccurate. He said IHIT found no evidence to indicate the four officers made plans in advance to deploy their tasers, nor was there any such suggestion in notes he made of a conversation he had with Supt. Bent.

He was not asked why he thought Supt. Bent made the comment he did.

"He is someone I personally respect a great deal, but the way he portrayed my comments in [the passage] is wrong."

theglobeandmail.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)10/6/2009 9:46:36 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Lawyers defend RCMP officers against allegations at Dziekanski inquiry

By James Keller (CP) – 59 minutes ago

VANCOUVER, B.C. — Four RCMP officers who have been portrayed as incompetent liars who needlessly stunned Robert Dziekanski multiple times with a Taser are now getting a final chance to paint a different picture at the public inquiry into the man's death.

The officers' lawyers began final arguments on Tuesday and were to continue on Wednesday, refuting claims of a coverup and justifying the officers' response at Vancouver's airport two years ago.

Their most ardent accusers have already summed up their arguments, with lawyers for Dziekanski's mother and the Polish government alleging wrongdoing and then a conspiracy to justify what happened.

Poland said Tuesday it wants Commissioner Thomas Braidwood to disregard what the officers told the inquiry earlier this year and make findings of misconduct against them.

"The officers' conduct can be construed as nothing short of an intentional act to subvert the course of justice," the country's lawyer, Don Rosenbloom, told Braidwood.

"It is well within your mandate to rule that the four officers were not credible and that their evidence should be discounted."

Dziekanski, a Polish citizen moving to Canada to live with his mother in Kamloops, B.C., died on Oct. 14, 2007, at Vancouver's airport.

Rosenbloom said the officers acted too quickly when they arrived at the scene, where Dziekanski had been throwing furniture, and used the Taser without justification.

And when the RCMP began to examine the in-custody death, Rosenbloom said the officers lied to investigators and continued to lie when they testified at the inquiry earlier this year.

He pointed to numerous inaccuracies in their initial statements to police, which appeared to paint Dziekanski as more violent and aggressive than what can be seen on an amateur video of the confrontation.

"No reasonable interpretation of the conduct of the four officers can lead one to conclude anything but that they acted at best with gross misconduct," Rosenbloom said.

The commissioner has the power to make findings of misconduct against the officers or anyone else when he writes his final report.

But two of the officers' lawyers told Braidwood on Tuesday that the Mounties acted properly at the airport and were honest - if mistaken - when later recalling what happened to police.

"(Const. Bill) Bentley now faces allegations of misconduct, which if substantiated could destroy a reputation that has already been compromised by intense media coverage," Bentley's lawyer, David Butcher, told the inquiry.

Butcher said the officers knew a bystander had taken a video recording of the incident, and one even took down the names of about a dozen witnesses to pass on to investigators.

He also noted the officers each gave their statements immediately and without lawyers.

"Somebody who wants to cover up does not want to create a record of the eye witnesses," said Butcher.

"Had these officers been intent on a course of conduct of covering up, the very first thing they would have done was lawyered up."

Ted Beaubier, who represents Const. Gerry Rundel, described most of the errors in Rundel's statements as relatively minor and "not unreasonable" in the circumstances.

"There's no question that events unfolded extremely rapidly and sometimes within seconds," said Beaubier.

"It's been said that these officers were trained with respect to observation . . . but does that take them beyond human beings with respect to being affected by a traumatic event that took place in front of them?"

Because Bentley and Rundel weren't the ones carrying the Taser or giving orders to use it, neither Butcher nor Beaubier discussed the weapon's use in detail, saying their clients couldn't be held accountable for that decision.

But they did reject the suggestion their clients approached Dziekanski too quickly when they arrived without first speaking to witnesses to assess the situation.

Butcher said the 911 dispatcher told the officers they were responding to a drunk man throwing luggage. While Dziekanski wasn't intoxicated, it was clear when they arrived the man had thrown furniture.

He said even though Dziekanski wasn't violent the moment officers approached him, it was reasonable for them to believe the situation could quickly deteriorate.

"Any suggestion that the police should have taken these steps reflects a naive misunderstanding of the realities and practicalities of police work," said Butcher.

And even if Dziekanski wasn't actually about to turn violent, Butcher said that doesn't matter.

"The police don't have to be right," he said.

"They can have completely misinterpreted what was happening here, but if they're belief was reasonable, then no misconduct can be found against them."

Butcher was scheduled to finish his submissions on Wednesday, followed by lawyers for the officer who fired the Taser, Const. Kwesi Millington, and the supervising officer, Cpl. Benjamin (Monty) Robinson.

Three of the four Mounties are fighting a court challenge of the provincial inquiry's jurisdiction to make findings of misconduct against federal police officers.

The federal government, in a written final submission, makes the same argument for the RCMP and the Canada Border Services Agency.

google.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (13249)1/17/2010 11:15:53 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37139
 
Hellbound woman gunned down by Alberta cops. Inquiry and cover up begin in earnest.

"Cop kills woman in standoff

Officer was 'trying to defend his own life,' police say

By Laura Drake and Alexandra Zabjek

January 17, 2010

EDMONTON - Edmonton police shot and killed a woman outside her north-end apartment Saturday, putting an end to a brief, but dramatic standoff that saw her point what looked like a pistol at uniformed officers.

According to numerous witness accounts, the woman, a mother of four, spent the final hour of her life wandering the halls of her apartment building, pointing the weapon at neighbours, police and even friends.

Marilyn Fryingpan, a friend who lives in the building, said the woman was suicidal and suffered severe headaches, a consequence of a car accident. The woman self-medicated with sleeping pills and pain pills, Fryingpan said, and she had been drinking Saturday.

The woman's problems began as a fight with her sons, who had been up all night drinking and being loud, Fryingpan said.

Police were called to the building, at 8411 119th Avenue, just after 2 p.m.

Vernon Grainge, the apartment's caretaker, was outside having a smoke when they arrived. Grainge said the officers told him there was a problem in Suite 13.

"I let them in and they go walking up the stairs," Grainge said. When they reached the second floor landing, a woman Grainge recognized as a tenant appeared one floor above. She pointed what looked like a gun at the officers and they yelled at her to drop it, Grainge said. Instead, she pointed it at Grainge, who was inside the ground floor foyer.

"I was thinking, pull the trigger. Pull the trigger and at least then I'll know if it's real," he said, hours later.

The woman didn't pull the trigger, and Grainge escaped outside.

The chronology of what happened next inside the building is unclear.

Cassandra Littlewolf, who lives on the second floor, saw the two officers run by her apartment at one point, followed by the woman.

The woman also came to Fryingpan's second-floor door.

"She saw me, then pointed the gun at me, so I closed the door," Fryingpan said.

Through her peephole, Fryingpan saw the woman going from suite to suite. "She was just standing in the hallway, going around and round with the gun."

Eventually the woman left the apartment before coming back in again. When she left a second time, Fryingpan's mother, who also lives in the building, was watching.

Freda Fryingpan saw the woman leave the apartment building carrying the weapon. She walked toward a group of officers, some of whom were crouched behind a Dumpster and others gathered near a pole.

Another witness, who wanted to be anonymous, said he saw the woman walk outside carrying a gun into the alley, which was filled with police officers.

"They yelled, 'Drop the gun, drop the gun, drop the gun,' " he said.

The woman appeared unfazed and kept walking toward the officers, he said, raising her arm and holding the gun sideways. The witness ducked and heard two shots.

When he looked up, the officers had surrounded the woman.

"I really feel for those police officers, that's got to be a horrible thing for them to deal with," he said. "They gave her every opportunity."

Clifton Purvis, the executive director of the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team, the provincial body that will conduct the investigation into the woman's death, confirmed that two shots were fired. The woman was hit and received emergency care on the scene, but was pronounced dead in hospital.

At some point during the altercation in the alley, a police officer was bit on the leg by a dog. She received stitches and was released from hospital Saturday night.

Only police officers fired shots during the confrontation, Purvis said, and as of Saturday night, he could not say whether what the woman was carrying was a working firearm.

The officer who shot the woman was an experienced member of the force, said Edmonton Police Association president Sgt. Tony Simioni.

"He is doing as well as can be expected under the circumstances. It's never pleasant to have to go through this, it's not what we sign up for. However, having said that, we are quite confident he did what he was trained to do," Simioni said.

Purvis said he does not know how long the investigation into the shooting will take.

"I can tell you that we are acutely aware that it is everybody's best interest to complete the investigation in a timely fashion," he said. "But we will not cut any corners and our goal is to deliver to the police service and the community a thorough investigation."

Simioni stands behind the members involved, he said he understands there will be public scrutiny of the shooting.

"When we have to take a human life, or when we shoot to take a human life ... the public has a right to know whether it was justified or not and at this stage we're quite confident that it was."

edmontonjournal.com