Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (490402)	6/24/2009 1:46:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572616

CJ, > Well, if he hadn't funded development of the Stinger, it would have been difficult for the mujahadeen to get them, now wouldn't it? And Al Gore took the initiative to create the Internet. Liberals are geniuses. Let's send Al Gore and Jimmy Carter to North Korea. Tenchusatsu

To: combjelly who wrote (490402)	6/24/2009 1:51:48 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572616

I see you are backing off of your claim that there were no smart weapons at the end of Carter's term. I'm not backing off of it. There were rudimentary "smart" weapons in WWI -- measured by "smartness" of the day. But they wouldn't have been considered "smart" by standards of the Vietnam era. The term "smart weapon" as we think of it today didn't resemble anything we used in the Vietnam era. There were a couple instances were a laser guided munition was deployed in Vietnam (notably a bridge near the border on the Trail our other weapons systems had been unable to knock out). But obviously, there were not any major weapons systems involving satellite guided munitions or unmanned vehicles as we have today. If you want to call a vehicle run by a hard-wired remote "smart", then I guess you can do that.