Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stomper who wrote (209164)	7/4/2009 7:45:03 AM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

There is already an international residential building code. It has been around for many years and, among many other things, it specifies required levels of energy efficiency for the building. Michigan uses it, as do many other states. The large builders like it because they don't have to learn/know all the various local ordinances, many of which are politically motivated. There is also already an International Energy Conservation Code. My code book has entire chapters on energy conservation guidelines/requirements. energystar.gov States are not required to adopt these codes, but many have. Michigan does not require an energy analysis for modification to existing buildings. That may be what Congress is trying to change. I have studied and know how to do energy analysis, and sizing analysis for heating/AC. It's a fairly good methodology but some of it is a complete waste of time. The results of the analysis are almost always determined by a few key items.

To: stomper who wrote (209164)	7/4/2009 2:28:24 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 306849

stomper, don't think for a minute that al gore didn't have inside information form the elites.