Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nevada9999 who wrote (169097)	7/10/2009 11:18:28 AM
From: loantech	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312200

I guess those Arab flyers planners were pretty sharp then? Controlled demolition by airplane. I have no dog in the hunt I have no idea what caused this but if what you say is true then the flyer/planners were just as sharp as demo experts IMO.

To: Nevada9999 who wrote (169097)	7/10/2009 11:24:28 AM
From: Cheeky Kid	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312200

One of my best friends (God rest his soul) was a firefighter for 13 years, stationed at the Calgary International Airport. Years ago we were taking about fires and he was amazed at how steel beams would bend and twist causing the structure to collapse. He said he had seen really old buildings devastated by fire still standing, because there support beams were made of solid wood. The steel gave way before the solid wood beams would.

To: Nevada9999 who wrote (169097)	7/10/2009 12:01:55 PM
From: robnhood	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312200

Why did WTC7 fall down? And all of them fell exactly like controlled demolitions. How could this all happen? No buildings have EVER fallen like that even in war bombings.

To: Nevada9999 who wrote (169097)	7/10/2009 12:37:46 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312200

" It takes months to set up and many miles of wire." yes exactly. But they covered up the truth of 911 by destroying building 7 where the plans were hatched and carried out. Now why would anyone want to completely destroy building 7 which would never have collapsed on its own? What was in tower 7? wtc7.net first of all you cannot bring a 48 story building or two 110 story buildings down with one charge. Does this look like one charge to you? youtube.com As far as building 7 they would not even have time to plant even one charge in all that confusion. Building 7 was more damaged than some think but it was in no danger of collapse in a symmetrical fashion in 8 seconds. You guys who support the official story are living in a fantasy world, one which has been exposed thousands of times by people who know what they are talking about. This whole thing was scripted, the motive being insurance money because the towers had to be destroyed anyway because of asbestos so they figured they would do yet another "Operation Northwoods" or another Reischstag fire. Its a very old trick. Attack your own people and blame it on your enemies and thus get the support of the ignorant in your population who believe everything they are told. Here's where the whole thing came apart...watch carefully BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE youtube.com youtube.com