SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (99600)7/12/2009 9:10:07 AM
From: dave92 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
The real reason Obama rejects 2nd stimulus is that we can't afford a 2nd stimulus and our debt holders will revolt if the fed just prints more money.

It is a whole new world; the fed unable to "just print money".



To: mishedlo who wrote (99600)7/12/2009 9:20:32 PM
From: Steve Lokness1 Recommendation  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 116555
 
Obama Rejects Second Stimulus

That would be the third or fourth stimulus wouldn't it? There was the stimulus plan from Bush and some have called Tarp a stimulus plan. What would you have Obama do - nothing? That would be political suicide. The Bush stimulus obviously didn't work and Obama's may not either - but as a nation we better suck it up, stop bitching and work together as a society. I'm so sick of everyone blaming each other climbing into their respective ideological corners - but have nothing real to offer.

What we need is time, lots of time to deleverage the mess made before Obama was our President. He's been president for barely 6 months and unless you think the economy can be turned off and on like a water faucet, what does one really expect given the economy he inherited?

With the comments on this thread, I would think the people here for the most part would be cheering Obama for dismissing a second stimulus.

steve



To: mishedlo who wrote (99600)7/12/2009 10:37:27 PM
From: riversides  Respond to of 116555
 
The Great American Bubble Machine,

rollingstone.com

nytimes.com