Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: manalagi who wrote (58672)	7/15/2009 10:23:51 AM
From: manalagi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

John Kerry and Edward Kennedy, the champions of the liberals. Are they for real? Are they suddenly become dumb senators for voting $ 400 million to keep making the antiquated F-22 while McCain opposes the project. Spend $ 400 millions just to save some jobs at Lockheed. Would not the affected workers be better off getting just free $ 100 million and and cancel ethe F-22, and save the other $ 300 millions? And these two senators are the ones liberals think they are the heroes. Those liberals who think they are without sin, just look how out of touch Kerry and Kennedy are. So, not just the right wing conservatives are running down the nation, the liberals are no different. Six half a dozen! news.yahoo.com Stop the F-22 Peter Rothberg Peter Rothberg – Tue Jul 14, 2:21 pm ET The Nation -- This post was written by Sarah Jaffe, a blogger, freelance journalist and Nation intern. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As symbols of the overinflated military budget go, the F-22 takes the cake. The Washington Post recently reported that the jet costs $44,000 an hour to fly (in addition to its $350 million price tag) and requires 30 hours of maintenance for every hour it spends in the air. Military experts agree that the F-22 is outdated and unnecessary. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has called the plane a "niche silver-bullet solution," and has urged President Obama to veto any bill that continues reinstated funding for the jet. The F-22 was designed in the 1980s to fight presumable Soviet fighter planes that had yet to be developed, and has suffered since its inception from flaws and budget overruns. It has never been flown over Iraq or Afghanistan. There is even a lawsuit, recently reopened, alleging that Lockheed Martin, producers of the jet, has knowingly supplied defective F-22s to the Air Force since 1995. In a Washington Post op-ed, Air Force Secretary Michael Donley and Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz wrote: This is the time to make the transition from F-22 to F-35 production. Within the next few years, we will begin work on the sixth-generation capabilities necessary for future air dominance. We support the final four F-22s proposed in the fiscal 2009 supplemental request, as this will aid the long-term viability of the F-22 fleet. But the time has come to close out production. That is why we do not recommend that F-22s be included in the fiscal 2010 defense budget. Yet Congress seems determined to keep manufacturing the jet despite Gates' recommendation to cancel the program. The House approved a measure to spend $400 million on the F-22, and the Senate is expected to soon vote. Both the United Steelworkers and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers are appealing to lawmakers to keep production going in order to save jobs but there are cheaper and less bellicose ways to provide manufacturing jobs for American workers than building planes we don't need that hemorrhage cash. The problem is that the military budget is such a sacred cow that Secretary Gates' four percent increase in his budget was spun as, essentially, a cut that would open America up to terrorist attacks. That's why the full Senate is taking up the issue of the F-22 this week, after the Armed Services committee voted to spend $1.75 billion more on the jet. The votes are, for once, not split along party lines--Senator John McCain is an ardent opponent of the jet, while staunch Democrats like John Kerry and Edward Kennedy are on the F-22's side. But Lockheed has done a good job of spreading the money and jobs around--more than 40 states have F-22-related jobs, and 58 percent of Lockheed's political contributions go to Democrats. Under President Obama, we have a chance to cut some of the waste from the military budget and redirect that money to critical healthcare initiatives and for programs that will provide more jobs at less cost.