Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (496134)	7/17/2009 8:13:10 PM
From: TopCat	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1574179

"Well, Bush managed to blame Clinton for close to 6 years. So I'd say at least that long." I don't believe that....but regardless....the characteristics you didn't like about Bush you are willing to accept so long as it is Obama. Do I have that right?

To: combjelly who wrote (496134)	7/18/2009 6:20:38 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574179

Well, Bush managed to blame Clinton for close to 6 years. Do you a couple of links on that? Or just hearsay... Taro

To: combjelly who wrote (496134)	7/18/2009 11:25:08 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574179

>>Bush managed to blame Clinton for close to 6 years. Bush rarely, if ever, blamed Clinton for anything and certainly not for six years. Even 9/11, for which Clinton was directly responsible, Bush would stop short of placing blame. Bush really didn't get involved in the blame game anymore than was absolutely essential. Contrast this with Obama who, between him and his surrogates have blamed Bush DIRECTLY hundreds, if not thousands, of times in different speeches and interviews. It is one of the most shameless displays I've seen from a president.