Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (496558)	7/20/2009 1:52:45 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571786

You're being silly. She said she wanted a diversity of opinion. From where I am coming, that's normal. Bull shit! She clearly thought he was incapable of making an arguement against a white man. He was there arguing a case about something that had nothing to do with color. To say that other black disagreed with him was like telling him he was supposed to tow the black line and stay in his place like a good Ni&&@r is supposed to do.

To: tejek who wrote (496558)	7/20/2009 2:05:34 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571786

bull crap ted. "You're being silly. She said she wanted a diversity of opinion. From where I am coming, that's normal." He brought documentation of research by experts on energy to present for the debate on green jobs. She named powerful black groups and black spokespersons who did not do any research on this project and were not involved in energy development and had not even expressed support for her proposal while suggesting they would oppose his view. She didn't even realized many of his associates are members of those groups. He objected to the racist tactic and he gave his reasons why they were racist. He was accurate and truthful. You've already been shown that, repeatedly. Someone even predicted you'd ignore it until this week and then start saying 'what racism'. I'm sure longnshort appreciates you proving him right but how shallow do you have to be in your frauds. That isn't even original, you do it all the time.