To: prometheus1976 who wrote (52926 ) 7/30/2009 11:33:14 PM From: TobagoJack Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217617 the japanese typically showed a lot of bravery against unarmed civilians as well, per nanking, and puzzling that anyone would reference the event as a one-on-one fight when china was busying itself at civil war, i.e. china can afford a civil war while being invaded by japan, and i doubt japan can afford same if the situation were reversed the sino japan war could only have resulted in one outcome had usa not saved japan from its destined fate that would have been no different than germany's true destiny which was napolean's factual outcome japan folded quickly enough after 2 nukes whereas china fought both the russians and americans, and concurrently, knowing full well of the atom possibilities by both, separately or in collusion, when it did not possess any atomic comeback here, it is on video, marines randomly chosen by opposing sides youtube.com to attribute the wwii victory to america is stretching the truth by vast amount, i.e. while america's entry shorten the war, but the outcome was fated the bad science fictions are being exposed for what they are one by one, fox tv not withstanding, because the truth is heavy and gravity works, starting with the dynamic, flexible, econo-financial-monetary nonsense, coursing through the mob ruled democracy, etc etc per rome and greece, nothing more and nothing truly different. the traditions, just military adventures based on other's temperary weaknesses, so much pizza and salad, a bit of paper called the constitution made necessary when most carried guns and recognized no sovereign, and when land can be robbed from those marked for genetic extinction, is all. :0)