SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (214801)8/8/2009 7:49:09 PM
From: John KoligmanRespond to of 306849
 
I think so, they didn't waste much time adding money to it. I was in NY when the program started and was shocked that the money ran out before I was able to return home to try and participate. I really wasn't planning on buying a car at this time but the clunker deal, (and significant discounts on desireable high quality high MPG cars in addition) was too good to pass up. I paid less for the Civic then I did for the first Honda Accord we bought in 1987. That car went for full list due to demand and was around $13,500..

Best regards,
John



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (214801)8/8/2009 11:48:32 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Works a hell of a lot better than TARP. I hate cash for clunkers, but if the goal is to prop up the eoncomy, there's no question which is better.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (214801)8/9/2009 5:31:54 AM
From: Bank Holding CompanyRespond to of 306849
 
Cash for clunkers is chump change compared to TARP, TARP2, TALF, StimGS, AIG, ect ect ect.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (214801)8/9/2009 5:54:03 PM
From: Skeeter BugRespond to of 306849
 
Jim, the $700 billion wasn't meant to stimulate - that's the con. it was meant by bankers to cover their buddy bankers' losses.

that's it.

they couldn't say that, so they said they were doing it for your benefit, but it was always a lie.