SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (504088)8/12/2009 2:23:44 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577030
 
Insurance at the Federal level is OK - but sue them at the local level. That makes no sense - it's inconsistent.

Malpractice is about suing providers, which are licensed by the state. Jeez.

States are not involved in this debate.

LOL. Who regulates doctors and insurance companies? Why does my state have tort reform that limits malpractice awards?

You really are for big centralized government aren't you?



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (504088)8/12/2009 2:25:38 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577030
 
Eric, > Insurance at the Federal level is OK - but sue them at the local level. That makes no sense - it's inconsistent.

Another example of a liberal running away from an issue. Most of them simply don't want to believe that rampant malpractice lawsuits are major factors in the rise of health care costs.

Tenchusatsu



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (504088)8/12/2009 2:34:21 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 1577030
 
States are not involved in this debate.

But they should be, and if the bill goes as it is, some will be suing for infringement of their jurisdiction.