SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (23722)10/29/1997 8:35:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
THE LAWSUIT EXISTS

LOOK IT UP IN FEDERAL COURT FILES. IT IS ON THE DOCKET.

ALSO THE ONE IN SUPERIOR COURT IN MARICOPA COUNTY. IT ALSO
EXISTS.

supcourt.maricopa.gov

ENTER CV97-19376

sheesh! you broker guys are a font of misinformation.



To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (23722)10/29/1997 8:42:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
You can sue for wash trading. Noranda did it to V. MacMillan
in 1964.

You can sue for anti-trust.

It has worked before.

There is buying stock and buying stock. Conspiring to fix prices
sounds a bit off in the real life stock support game, but we tend to forget is that there is a line between stock support and swindling.

It may have been crossed.

echarter@vianet.on.ca



To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (23722)10/30/1997 6:27:00 AM
From: TheBusDriver  Respond to of 35569
 
this makes pretty good sense to me Matt....especially the part about the news media picking it up. IPM is being watched VERY closely. If they had any allegation of fraud we would know more about this in major publications and not just on this thread.

wayne


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News