Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (828)	10/29/1997 8:55:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Thall: That is kind of a cheap shot, is it not? And I thought you were minding your manners these days. Shall I point out that our kitty litter miner from New Mexico doesn't even understand BLM permitting? You are suggesting that Lycopodium and Bateman are NOT beyond repproach? If so, on what basis, or are you reverting back to your old blowhard self?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (828)	10/29/1997 9:00:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 3744

Sounds good to me. I went to a mining school. Mt Everest must be solid quartz because of the law of isostasy. Gold most often occurs with quartz. Therefore Mt Everest is a high grade gold mountain. I would say we can extract it at a profit of $50.00 per ton. There are 13,888,888,888 tons of rock and therefore 694 billion dollars PROFIT to be made. Of course the gold is invisible or Hillary would have found it while pounding pitons in. Anyone who says otherwise for a nanosecond is a c.........r and not worth a minute of our time except to defame and libel and if that doesn't work I am telling my mom. echarter@vianet.on.ca