Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (23754)	10/29/1997 10:04:00 PM
From: Furry Otter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

The fact that a gadfly like Lumbert can file pro se multiple lawsuits against multiple persons, and then let them sit on the docket, unprosecuted, until the judge notices and clears it off, should also debunk EC's vehement assertion that a person needs evidence to bring a lawsuit. There is a rule of procedure called Rule 11 that is designed to deal with people like Bernie (it requires a reasonable basis in law and fact for bringing a lawsuit), but alas, it is seldom enforced at all, and almost never against pro se plaintiffs. IPM could probably counterclaim for defamation, but why bother, he's probably judgment proof. Regards, Otter