Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (728)	10/30/1997 11:37:00 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11676

Hello Ed In reply to your post #728. Allow me to offer another interpretation just for the hell of it. Tell me if you think it makes any sense? You suggest that the anomoly is plunging and heading to the northeast I believe that would take it onto the Major General joint venture, right? However, the NR did not say that Teck was currently drilling that claim block, which you would think they would, if that is where they thought the massive sulfide body would be found. Since they have already drilled the Major General property, they presumably made their current drilling decision, knowing what they found in the drill cores from there. Take a look again at the graphic. SW to NE (thin to thick), but this cross section may only tell half the story. It could also be dipping/angled from the south (high) down to the north (low) as well, right? That massive sulfide lense in 67 could be dipping to the north along that flank of the gabroic intrusion. The NR stated that one drill remained on the NAI property, and one on the CYP property. I am speculating that Teck is exploring which direction that massive sulfide lense plunges (is fed from) the north or the south flank of that intrusion? The last drill was is currently on 100% DRZ ground which is to the southwest I believe. Presumably that is also the flank or down dip of the gabroic intrusion and where there must be another coicident gravity high and EM conductor. Does the above hold water? Chief and all, by all means feel free to shoot some holes in this post. Regards