SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2886)9/2/2009 11:01:42 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
<I disagree that its just me making folks like Dawkins or PZ Myhers influential. >

He's influential with people who like (or hate and like to hear it for their own reasons) to hear the message. Period. Most people in this country don't even know who he is. But Micheal Jackson!? There's someone.

<Why does Michael Shermer have a column in Scientific American? He's not a scientist, doesn't do any scientific research.>

Nor is Scientific American a "scientific journal".

DAK



To: Brumar89 who wrote (2886)9/3/2009 12:49:03 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
<As for McWhorter, what did change his position so radically? >

1.) Why don't you spell out what he did... I don't get it.

2.) This guy isn't exactly anybody in the field of science... never heard of him... who cares?

You know, you clearly LOOK FOR people involved with opining on religion vs science... no wonder you think there is some big conspiracy.

DAK


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News