Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (25149)	9/6/2009 6:47:07 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Respond to of 36921

I do, but it's not something I want to discuss with you because any further you've already formed an opinion, apparently based on politics, and not very much science

To: longnshort who wrote (25149)	9/6/2009 7:45:51 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Let me clarify my last remark. I do understand that ultimately what we do about the environment is a political decision. I would hope that this decision would be based on the best science available. I'm over here because I want to both debate and understand the science involved. I don't want to debate the politics of it here. I'm sure you are aware of all the political threads on SI that do nothing but. So if you want to argue something like Computer Engineers say that Computer Climate Modeling is crap because of: a. b. c. Fine--it is possible to argue about a. b. c. But what I don't want to participate in, here on this thread, is labeling. Inferring that computer climate modeling is part of a socialist agenda doesn't have anything to with the SCIENTIFIC validity of the same. The science either works or it doesn't. I want to talk about why or why not.