Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (27156)	9/15/2009 3:29:43 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

"the disproportional tendency of atheists who find themselves in positions of sufficient power to commit mass slaughter that subsequently engage in it cannot be dismissed as a mere coincidence" Vox Day <ROFLMAO!!! "disproportional tendency"! ROFMAO! Love to see that study.> Pleas stop with all the sophomoric rolling and laughing when all it shows is that you are too immature to engage in serious discussions. As to the merit of the case; It's simple math that even someone with your diminished capacity can easily see. There have not been all that many Atheists who have taken power. The ones that have, are notable for their blood lust. Stalin and Mao, alone are responsible for millions of their own peoples deaths. "OTOH, for someone who claims the ability to define "personal god" despite the inability to do so" I defined it several times in different ways but you have shown yourself to be an unreasonable ideologue who is unwilling to listen to facts or reason. I can't help it if you get your ideas about God from Oprah and Star Wars; and refuse to recognize that the Christian God (BY DEFINITION!) is personal, as opposed to some force. I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you because you aren't interested in what's true. BYE