SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (9753)9/22/2009 4:28:31 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 

But real rules. Not voluntary. And people still go to jail.


That's not the point of the example. The point is to illustrate that the functionality does not need to be at the federal level or even in a government entity. That the SEC setup differs in other regards is irrelevant. That's the point of using examples. They illustrate the key factor being communicated. The rest doesn't matter.

You're going to great lengths to resist the notion that oversight can occur without centralizing regulation. Pick at my examples all you want but you can't undermine that notion because it exists everywhere. Distribution and delegation are tried and true paradigms.



To: Road Walker who wrote (9753)9/22/2009 4:56:05 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
But real rules. Not voluntary.

The other thing off about this comment is that you're conflating whether the rules are voluntary with whether the process for reconfiguring the paradigm is voluntary.