SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (516308)9/27/2009 12:32:53 AM
From: bentway3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576610
 
"And an attack on Israel is no longer the same as if we are attacked. "

Other than in your paranoid mind, we're never HAD any such treaty, understanding or policy. Ever.

Israel has been attacked many times. We sent no troops. We provided no air support. We may have given them some intel, but that's the extent of it.

In the Lebanese invasion, Bush and Condi jetted over cluster bombs for them to kill Lebanese with, and was roundly criticized for it.



To: i-node who wrote (516308)9/27/2009 3:40:46 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576610
 
"And an attack on Israel is no longer the same as if we are attacked. That's the problem."

We would allow them to be annihilated or overrun????



To: i-node who wrote (516308)9/27/2009 3:52:45 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 1576610
 
Does this sound like we wouldn't defend them?

"http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251804542241&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull"


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News