Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (520395)	10/13/2009 5:33:54 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575344

"There you go again, _less. What isn't true?" The statement you made which I put into quotes when I responded with ..."Not true" is what I was refering to as "not true". See, here is the re-post. The fact that you could not even get a simple point like this reveals the extent of your deluded condition. You: "Can't craft an argument, so you go straight to the ad hominem attack." Me: "Not true" The statement above, in quotes, with the word "You" preceeding it. Hard to miss it was the only thing in the post and you managed to miss it though. Message 26015667 "Again. Point out a post where I was wrong. Much less delusional." The one I am responding to for starters. Your statement that I can't craft an argument is glaringly false on the surface, as I've engaged in numerous disputes and I'm quite certain many arguments I have laid out have been well supported. Also when I put into quotes a statement that I declare is not true and you are unable to determine what I am calling not true, your delusions are exposed without needing to go into any further level of proof. Even so you've been given numerous other examples by several posters. Examples like this one that really require no further explanation. That you've never acknowledged that simple fact, while flailing around defensively and continuing to declare, no one has offered such evidence, further illustrates the point.