Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (521625)	10/19/2009 1:00:53 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1580645

You only saw it as a weak response because you don't get it. I knew you were anxious to get your childish response that it was because Kennedy was weak. Say it was. Doesn't matter. You don't think we will ever have a weak president again? It doesn't matter if it was because Kennedy was seen as weak. You don't think some other president will be tested? Ever? For one reason or another. Say Obama is weak and is tested. It makes my point still, that we may go to the brink again. That is the friggen point!! So how is that prevented? Only one way. Get rid of all the nuclear weapons. Which means we need a president who can work towards that goal. It is a statistical certainty it will happen again. If we follow your path it is an absolute certainty your kids or grand kids will be involved in a nuclear war soon or later. We take my path of diplomacy we have a chance. We take your path of aggression and we have no chance. What is the matter with your thinking that you cannot see it will happen again as long as nuclear weapons exist? The world will keep going to the brink until some crazy person starts a war. We would all be a lot safer if China, Russia and the US made everyone get rid of them. We need a president that understands that.