Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (904)	10/31/1997 11:35:00 AM
From: Robert Saito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

geez, larry...you should be happy, not griping about the absence of continued comments by ec...would you be happy if 50 more of us joined in on the cheerleading on the thread? do you think that we could help promote a few more sheep to drive up the share price a few cents? hey everybody, there's a halloween party over on the ipm thread! spooks and goblins invited! incantations and witches brew- magic potions, gold dust and fairy powder, all you can snort! our mantra through the night..."IPM is Bre-xpectations, IPM is Bre-xpectations, IPM is Bre-xpectations...we gonna get rich, we gonna get rich, we gonna get rich... go ipm, go ipm, go ipm... i love this stock, i love this company, i love the ceo, i love the IR person, i love the promoters, i love the news releases, i love my fellow posters, i love the receptionist with sexy voice, i love the desert, i love all my profits, i love this story, i love how nobody else has ever actually mined gold from dirt, this is great, this is cool, this is the highlight of my life..." -just having some fun, larry...you should try it sometime....lighten up a little, good luck with your bets -RS ;-)

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (904)	10/31/1997 1:20:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

Your opinion is that he is flaky. I won't second that. Evidently he did not succeed in his other suits. Probably money as much as anything but that is recent history too. Evidently he is litigous. Ok, So are many lawyers and I know a few miners that have been in a dozen or more. At any rate it does not go very far to deny the righteousness of his cause, just his resources. IQ wise he may be above you and I. I myself was in two suits in the past five years. Won one, lost one. Should start four more. One on stolen patents, one on endangerment and one on breach of promise/malfeasance/breach of trust. May have to start a breach suit end of this year for more stock. World is full of torts. You would have to agree. $$$$$$$$$ is the key to successful litigation. Just try suing IBM. The gov't has tried and failed four times. Does that mean their suit is without reason.. that the lawyers are flaky? what about the new anti-trust against Microshaft? without reason? May fail. echarter@vianet.on.ca