Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (23928)	10/31/1997 2:01:00 PM
From: Roger Cordell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Jill says that they have reached an agreement and Lew will be allowed to post again. Now, if we could just get Chatters to post a few phone numbers........ Roger

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (23928)	10/31/1997 2:12:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 35569

Well what you just said is actually libel. not serious of course... But the statement of an analysis of one persons facts and what I stated do not make my ethics bad in itself. How so? LG said that Bloomberg was a party to fraudulent journalism. that they conspired to drive a stock price down by lying. That is serious stuff. It is my opinion that the assays are salted and fraudulent. I did not say who did it. I don't know. I suspect that someone in the company knows. Its my opinion. I based it on my analysis of the likelihood of it being correct, the gov't opinion, associated companies with similar problems, the history of some of the participants and the doubtfullness of their previous ventures and many many other suspect things. But I stated it as an opinion. Lew Green comes out and says "you guys are dirty for X, Y and Z and its is A, B, and C." He committed. But still I don't think he intended libel at all. EC<:-}