To: robert b furman who wrote (15270 ) 11/9/2009 10:36:16 PM From: ahhaha Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758 Ive been thinking that as the Dollar declines and commodity prices rise, False assumption. We're not in a regime of intrinsic inflation, but one of intrinsic deflation that's evolving into overt deflation due to the impediments erected by DM. You have been immersed in L'ancienne Regime for so long you have no idea about how the other one works.does this not aid in propping up real estate prices. Nothing "props up" RE prices except FED, by relegating the creation of money to banks a la 19th century. FED created $300B in high powered money that should have brought about 10 x $300B = $3T in spendable credit. It created 0. Meanwhile I hear this guy hawking Mousy's book with the con that he'll give you a silver dollar if you'll buy it. Mousy = Ron Paul.After excess inventory is absorbed,then the replacement value of existing real estate has to support prices. I can only say, you have no clue. It is possible to unwind some kind of meaning out of this collection of words, but at the very best, the meaning that can be squeezed out is backward. It's some mistaken notion about how demand management works in Econ 1 texts.Does this not assist the fed in their efforts to stablize RE, It is true that the moon is made of green cheese implies that my father keeps his horses in the cowshed. as support for foreclosure properties is incentivized by Government tax credits? This clause cannot be coordinated with your previous one. It's like saying, "I saw a man speeding down the freeway and then some water went down the drain". In the lingo this is called 'non sequitur". I don't say "non sequitur" because in this era too many are too illiterate and stupid to know what it means. Then the editor says I misspelled "non sequitur". I don't know why I interact with humans in this era. Scotty, do it.