SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Reilly Diefenbach who wrote (229608)11/20/2009 11:49:17 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
In the current environment of near-complete regulatory capture by the financial services industy (ie, Squid, Ink.) there's no hope for effective regulation. Which is why those clowns (financial services management teams....Lord Blankfein and Jamie Dimon and John Mack and Ken Lewis and the WFC clown) needed to be tossed out on the Street face first once the immediate "crisis" (and I use that term loosely) was solved. Simon Johnson and William Black have that 100% correct. Until that happens nothing will change. Even if we throw out the current Clowngress completely (which we absolutely should) the new batch will be sucking on the teat (or other appendages) of the financial services graft machine within days. We need, at a minimum:

1) Campaign finance reform-NO donations from corporations, trade groups or unions of any kind. Donations from individuals only, limited to 500 or 1000 clownbucks.

2) Reform of the revolving door between regulatory bodies and the industries they regulate. You work for the SEC? Great, you win a lifetime ban on working for a borker.

3) Reinstatement of Glass Steagal

4) Repeal of Gramm-Leach-Bliley.

5) Use of the Sherman antitrust act to bust up Too Big Too Fail Banks. If that's not adequate, rewrite the law so it is.

Did I leave anything out? Feel free to email to yer Clowngressman, who will undoubtedly ball it up and toss it out. Or to the Op-Ed page of yer local fishwrap/newspaper.



To: Reilly Diefenbach who wrote (229608)11/20/2009 8:22:05 PM
From: neolibRespond to of 306849
 
I agree with much of what you state. In fact, I think the best regulation is simply draconian transparency laws. For financial transactions both parties should see a complete digital trail. I want to know if GS is on the opposite side of my trade. And very sever penalties for tampering with the digital trail data.

However, I'm less inclined to believe corruption is so rampant, and rather more inclined to believe that ineptness is.