Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (14386)	11/30/2009 12:39:51 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 86356

Your post shows a shocking lack of understanding of how science works. Scientists will use the latest peered reviewed models that there is a consensus around. Then if a competing theory gains traction because it explains more of the available data, then it will supercede teh old models. Your approach is to criticize, yet to provide no proof of your own criticism. In the science world, you would not be given any notice and zero credibility until you decided to do some work and provide a credible, numbers backed alternative theory.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (14386)	12/13/2009 1:42:11 AM
From: whitepine	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 86356

Eric is a fraud. He totally ran away from my questions and posts. I see no point in discussing anything with a 'true believer.' Others can waste their time. re: To: Eric who wrote (14384) 11/30/2009 12:05:37 PM From: Brumar89 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 15146 No, one doesn't have to build another model in order to say the alarmists models are crap. The burden of proof is on the alarmist side as they're demanding the world make vast changes on the basis of their models. BTW the emails reveal alarmists know their models are crap. He only picks new micro-points to argue while ignoring on contradictory positions and empirical evidence. Others who wish to engage a pillow with rational dialogue are attempting a rational assault on religion. Pointless and fruitless.