Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (534611)	12/5/2009 3:52:06 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577985

You don't know anything about something you hold strong opinions about, I don't really have a strong opinion about the subject but I do have a strong opinion about liberals trying to mislead the public. I do know something about statistical methods, and I can see there is a credible argument that these "scientists" are making shit up. and those opinions are contrary to the opinions of a vast majority of people who do know a lot about the subject There is no evidence to suggest that the "scientists" know anything about it. Everything they've said and done suggests otherwise, down to manipulating the data to try and influence outcomes and "losing" the data in an attempt to cover it up. I'm not a scientist but I'm no fool, either. Just as I was able to see the nonsense in your argument that a couple carloads of salt in Puget Sound would make one whet of difference in the environment (when talking to a well educated person on the subject) it is blatantly obvious to me there is insufficient information on which to base the GW nonsense. >> and you are more credible than someone else? I haven't lied about it. The scientists have.