Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (535455)	12/9/2009 4:49:01 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578531

Don't have to. This one has done the math and they get 750 ppm in less than a century. Published June 1997 - since then all those predictions and models have been revised downward - to match measured changes - sort of like the IPCC ocean level forecasts have been - got anything more up to date? PS: None of those describe the rate of co2 growth in the air - they talk about the emissions growth rate - not the same at all. Still looking for you're exponential growth rate in co2 air concentrations because 2.5% growth is not exponential and it's not the right variable anyway.