Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (536961)	12/16/2009 4:35:33 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577034

Less, > tejek, bentway, and combjelly have not earned the right to stand over them in judgement, quite to the contrary. I think Ted is OK. CJ wasn't making any judgements as far as I could tell. Bentway is Bentway; he likes seeing this kind of stuff. The sexism in the Tiger Woods scandal is different than the sexism that characterized the Palin bashing, IMO. Unlike Palin, the women that went after Tiger Woods deserve to be called skanks. Even Rachel Uchitel, who is playing the victim of media scrutiny, hired Gloria Allred, the lawyer who never saw a photo op she didn't like. The sexism here is that women are acting proud they bedded the best golfer in the world, the one who was recently declared "Athlete of the decade" by the AP. They're pushing the idea that women should get ahead in the world by sleeping with powerful celebrities. These women are a disgrace, and NOW should be calling them out for it. (I'm not surprised NOW is staying silent on this issue, though.) Tenchusatsu