Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24070)	11/2/1997 6:13:00 PM
From: JERRY GACH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Big mistake Bill....Now everyone will say that you are a shorter or threaten to email Jill and have you removed from the thread. Get real guys....It is not hard to understand that things do not happen in a timely fashion in mining, but this is getting ridiculous. Oh yeah, I love the 50 or so posts about how worried the shorters must be getting and how they cannot cover except at higher prices. Try buying some ipmcf tomorrow morning, it's not exactly the darling of the Nasdaq. Just being realistic.

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24070)	11/2/1997 6:30:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 35569

Well how long can they hide behind uncollectable nano-clusters of 45 atom gold and Platiunum? Do we not need to see the SEM work that proves these nano clusters? Proprietary or not do the shareholders not own this assay method? Lets see a hands on -nobody-would-argue demo. After all Scientific American showed us pictures of gold atoms. Let's see it Lee. As far as the special reagant we have.. I heard about the guys in salt lake city with their super heated assays 15 years ago. Is this the same group? Their special reagants sound a lot like the Naxos stuff that contained Platinum. Why didn't they say that? They are using platinum to collect platinum? It would have been ok to say that first. If its a scam its is looking like a classic shell game. Just lift all the shells please we paid for the table and take off your shirt, we would like to see what is up the sleeve. echarter@vianet.on.ca

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24070)	11/2/1997 6:43:00 PM
From: Wildcat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, About a month ago you said the lab proof of platinum could take 6 weeks. Now you say it is taking too long. <<To: Anne Lamb (21491 ) From: Bill Jackson Monday, Sep 29 1997 9:53PM EST Reply #21493 of 24081 Anne; It can take a lot more time for nickel-sulfur fusion assays. I have been quoted 6 weeks. >> What changed your tune? Wildcat

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24070)	11/2/1997 6:51:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, Are you still shorting the stock ? I couldn't resist after that Jerry Gach post. I'm glad to hear you saying that you don't believe that IPM is a scam. This is what I posted in a previous post. December 15, 1995 IPM made a press release. In that press release the following paragraphs appeared : "Behre Dolbear & Co. Inc., mining engineering consultants, currently provide management and technical oversight of the BRX Project under a long term contract to IPM. They performed a "due diligence" examination of all phases of IPM's drilling, sample handing and assay program and concurred with the selection the independent assay laboratories used for precious metal determinations. I am under the belief that people who are coming to this thread and bad mouthing the company saying it is a scam are of three varieties. 1. Shorters 2. Someone that has not done proper evaluation of what all sides are saying. 3. Those who refuse to believe anyone but Coggins. There are many high grade deposits in the US west. When I lived in Idaho, I went camping in the Sawtooth Mountains. There was a very interesting machine that floated on the river with a series of scoops on the front and a discharge conveyer on the back. As it dug it's way down the shallow river it would dig out the dirt in front, seperate the gold and discharge the rest behind it. The operation was haulted for environmental concerns but there was a sign there that explained that this machine removed $40MM worth of gold in a 1 mile stretch of the river when gold was only $35/oz. I know this is not relevant to IPM but why is it so easy to believe this and all the other mining operations but it is so difficult to believe IPM when the proof is there. There is a history of high gold concentrations being removed from the surrounding mountains. The engineering consultants each performed a due diligence prior to accepting work. So why can't people see this is for real ? Why do they continue to believe and rely on information provided to them by an unqualified person that runs a rock museum who didn't even make it through the topsoil when he took his sample? Why do they find it so easy to believe those people that are relying on the information from this source but they can't believe or disprove what I am saying when I sight examples of this not being true ? I just don't understand what to say to get people to start looking at IPM unbiasedly. Can you help? Chuck

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24070)	11/2/1997 7:12:00 PM
From: Theo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

<<is quite true regarding his prospective properties near Timmins. >> Bill, Have you seen third party verification that anything he said is true. He says that _we_ have to take his word for it. Can you prove your claims before IPM proves theirs. Can he?????????? Integrity is the action behind the philosophy. Its the proof. Show me the proof. IPM is proving. EC is a liar at least, and has no integrity at best. Third party proof. Show it!!!!!!!! Theo, still being FRIENDLY!!!