SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (537937)12/21/2009 4:15:35 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575771
 
Ted, > The first decade of the 21st century is the warmest since they started keeping records in 1850

Doesn't change the fact that we are in a local cooling cycle.

Where? Right around your house? Turn off the damn AC. LOL.

I don't doubt that man has had an effect on global temperatures, by the way. Maybe most of it is due to CO2, but when centuries of climate change are factored in, the effect of the human factor is a lot lower compared to what the zealots want us to believe.

I am not convinced that Man is the culprit either but I do know that Man is the one fouling up the air and water. What's wrong with cleaning up the air and water? And if it reduces the impact of GW, then its the icing on the cake.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (537937)12/21/2009 9:33:27 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575771
 
"Doesn't change the fact that we are in a local cooling cycle."

What do you mean with this? It isn't like it was a smooth rise to 1998 and it has been all downhill from there. 1998 might have been the local peak, but the average is still creeping up. And that does not make a cooling cycle.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News