SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (38729)11/3/1997 9:02:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Joe,
>>>I think you are way off.
First of all, even $1,000 is a lot of money for 90% of this planet. It's something they have to save for.
<<<

I don't know where you are trying to take us (in your - ahem - inexpensive auto)- but, I just hope 90% on this planet are smart enough to spend this $1000 on some decent food and clothing, rather than give in to some marketing hype about a sub $1000 computer that's not going to do anything useful for them. But, who knows, with modern marketing techniques, they can literally sell refrigerators to Esk..I mean Native Alaskans....

Second of all, you can get more than enough performance for under $1,000 for most normal applications. You just have to buy a Computer Shopper and browse. You will see for yourself.

That depends on what you term normal. I'll just pass on browsing Computer Shopper. I have enough browsing to do with SI, HSN, QVC, et al.

Actually, if you really want to an impact from a dollar spent, spend it on the monitor. You can get the top of the line for $1,500 to $1,750.

If I can afford a $1500 monitor, I think I would want Intel Inside my computer.

The rest of the system is mostly just sitting in idle. Try this. Start the system monitor of Windows 95 and watch it. Your CPU utilization will be mostly in 5-15%.

My car sits idle most of the time and rarely exceed <g> the speed limit, but I would like to know I could pass the MF (Motley Fool) tractor trailer in front of me when I need to.

>>>If you want to spend a lot on the hard drive, you can spend $1,000 on Seagate Cheetah, but it will mostly be sitting idle as well if you bought enough of cheap RAM, that gives you 1,000 times better performace than disk access for data sitting in the cache. IDE will do the trick for a typical user. Plus 32 to 64 MB of RAM.<<<

I thought Apple Engineers resolved that when Steve Jobs would not let them put a hard drive in the Apple IIe.

If you are at work, accessing data from the network, the chances are that your network is 10 Mbit/s Ethernet. I just ran a test, and single workstation (Cyrix 6x86-200 - $65) can flood the network with so many pockets that the bandwith of the network becomes the limitation. In this particular case, the file server (Pentium classic 100) had a CPU utilization of 15%, while the network bandwith was maxed out. Suppose we "upgrade" the file server to Pentium-II 300. What would we gain? Minimum performance gain. The only result would be that the CPU utilization would go down to about 7%. So instead of wasting 85% of the performance, we would be wasting 93% If you want more performance, you can get if by going to 100 Mbit/s ethernet.

My network cost me $50m a year to operate - get those Cyrix machines out of my sight --- relax, I'm only (partially) kidding.


I agree partially. You think that $1,000 is a Yugo. I think it's a Chevy. A Yugo to me are the $499 computers. Mercedes (without a monitor) is about $1,500. If you are spending more, you are buying a tank. Even though it is capable of driving through walls, has a gun to fire at things, chances are, you will never use those features.


The Yugo is more likely to get you from A to B than your $1000 Computer. (I don't know if they would let you park in front of Gucci's on Rodeo Drive - but it will get get you there).

Leave the gun alone. I need the gun metaphor to blow away some of these guys on SI (metaphorically - of course).

Regards,

Mary