SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (543704)1/14/2010 10:16:15 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1574485
 
Over the past several years, the president has repeatedly vowed to make the United States less dependent on foreign sources of oil. From the actions of Ken Salazar and his lieutenants, however, it would seem that the Interior Department's main mission is to reduce domestic energy production.

Surely, that is the effect of Salazar's announcement on January 6 that his department intends to slow the permitting process for energy projects on federal lands. The "fast-track" procedures approved by Congress in 2005, lauded by consumers as a way to increase production and reduce costs, are now to be replaced by the requirement of more paperwork, inspection, and layering of bureaucratic approval.

As our economy recovers, we are going to need cheap and reliable sources of energy. Almost providentially, at the very moment in our nation's history when this supply is most in need, a solution has presented itself: vast new discoveries of shale gas, and the development of the technology to release it. With the discovery of enormous fields of natural gas in Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and New York, as well as in other states and offshore, America is now the Saudi Arabia of natural gas. If one truly wished to reduce the nation's dependence on foreign energy, the only requirement would be for government to step aside and allow the free market to develop these remarkable reserves.

Unfortunately, this is the last thing we can expect from the Obama administration, which has been busy from day one tightening restrictions on domestic production of oil and gas. Most Americans like to believe that their president is fundamentally honest and sincere, so they must be perplexed by the contradiction between this particular president's actions and his words. As recently as December 8, 2009, Obama reiterated his pledge to reduce dependence on foreign oil, yet at the same time he was working feverishly to curtail domestic production of both oil and natural gas. An ordinary citizen would have to conclude that Obama is deranged.

Unfortunately, our president is not deranged, but cunning. Just as he has done with health care suppliers, Obama is putting the squeeze on domestic energy producers by tightening regulation and raising taxes and royalty fees. The intent of this shakedown is two-fold.

First, by threat and intimidation, Obama hopes to stifle political opposition from a powerful industry group. There might even be energy outfits, such as a major Midwestern electric utility, willing to support Obama's radical agenda if offered a carrot along with the usual stick. Second, by confiscating profits, government will increase revenue with which to expand its client base of voters.

The Chicago shakedown is crude but effective: Intimidate those who are productive, force them to hand over a portion of their earnings, and redistribute those funds to those who are not productive but who nonetheless vote. The result is the establishment of a dependable client base of supporters whose welfare benefits are maintained at the expense of productive businesses and wage-earners.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (543704)1/14/2010 2:04:45 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574485
 
This thread to me seems a close enough to mirror image of the current US society: Rather polarized and as you say, with a few guys closer to the mid.

My observation: Most of those well off the mid truly believe they are close to the mid.
In particular those way off to the left.

On my side it's different, nobody has an identity problem like that and seems quite satisfied with and proud of being exactly where he is positioned to the right.

/Taro



To: RetiredNow who wrote (543704)1/14/2010 3:27:37 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574485
 
Well, it's a thread that should be renamed, "The Politics of How to Ensure the US Never Gains Energy Freedom". Or the "Drill Baby Drill Only" thread. It's stupid and one-sided. This thread seems a little more balanced between neocons and liberals, and then there are a few centrists like myself. So yes, more interesting to me.

Its not just this thread. I subscribe to thestreet.com. All the Rs on that site are hoping for gridlock so there can be no more legislation passed under Obama after 11/2010. These are not teabaggers or so they claim; these are run of the mill Rs. They are trying to elect enough Rs this fall to make gridlock happen.

They are against everything.....the greening of America, alternative fuels, cap and trade, health care reform, taxing the banks, etc.

They rarely have anything positive to say. They talk more politics than stocks. Its gotten so bad subscribers have complained.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (543704)1/14/2010 3:54:04 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574485
 
Year of the electric car dawns

It was dark and rainy, and the battery on his nifty Mini E electric car was almost gone. Paul Heitmann rolled quietly through the suburban...

By Peter Whoriskey
The Washington Post


Puget Sound area

UNDER A $100 MILLION Department of Energy grant, the Puget Sound area is a test market for the first wave of electric cars. More than 2,000 charging stations will be built beginning next year, many in park-and-ride lots, at big-box stores and in corporate parking lots.
THE GRANT IS BEING SHARED by areas in four other states: Portland, Salem, Corvallis and Eugene, Ore.; San Diego; Phoenix and Tucson, Ariz.; and Chattanooga, Knoxville and Nashville, Tenn. Because the Portland area is included, the Interstate 5 corridor between Seattle and Portland is expected to have a string of stations, making it possible to go between the two major cities on nothing but electricity.


It was dark and rainy, and the battery on his nifty Mini E electric car was almost gone.

Paul Heitmann rolled quietly through the suburban New Jersey gloom, peering through the rain on the windshield, not sure what he was looking for, anxiety turning into panic. He needed juice. He noticed a Lukoil gas station, which was closed, and beside the point, anyway. But beyond the pumps, there was a Coke machine, and it was lit up.

"I thought 'Finally!' because I knew if there was light, there would be electricity," he said. "I managed to find the outlet behind the Coke machine and plugged in."

As many auto companies tell it, next year may be the year the massive U.S. auto industry really begins to go electric.

Nissan's all-battery Leaf is scheduled to go on sale in November. General Motors will begin selling the Chevy Volt, a primarily electric car (with a small auxiliary gasoline engine that kicks in to boost the car's range). Ford plans to produce an electric commercial van. The Obama administration has doled out $2.4 billion to companies involved in producing batteries and other parts of electric cars.

"We have to get on with the electrification of our industry," Ford Chairman William Clay Ford Jr. said Monday.

"I know we have to have an electric car," GM Chairman Edward Whitacre said last week.

But overshadowing prospects for the transition of the vast U.S. auto fleet to electric — and the billions of dollars the automakers invested in the switch — is the question of whether anyone beyond a sliver of enthusiasts will embrace the newfangled cars.

The only major automaker with a fleet of new all-electric vehicles priced for mainstream consumers is BMW, with its 500 Mini E electrics in what the company describes as a test of the technology. To judge from interviews with drivers and more than a dozen of their blogs, it also has proved a test of consumer adaptability.

Electrics pose two primary challenges to convention: When fully charged, they generally cannot travel even half the distance a conventional car can go on a full tank. And once the battery is depleted, there are few places to recharge besides home, and charging can take hours.

Heitmann, for example, sat in the dark beside the Coke machine for one midnight hour to make sure he had enough charge to make it the four miles to his mother's house.

"I sat there looking at the gas pumps that said $2.45 a gallon," he recalled. "And I thought, 'What I wouldn't give to be able to use that.' Two and a half dollars, and I could have gotten another 25 miles."

Still, Department of Transportation data show U.S. drivers travel an average of 29 miles a day, well within the electric vehicles' range.

Many Mini E drivers are rhapsodic about the car's performance and the promise of environmental benefits, as is Heitmann. After all, they have been willing to join a select group that pays about $850 a month to lease the cars and have a recharging wall box installed at their homes. But when Mini E drivers gather, their talk often turns to the art of maximizing the number of miles they can get with a single charge.

Their tricks: They slow down; driving fast takes more power per mile because of aerodynamics and other factors. So some poke along at 55 mph on the highway as other drivers zoom past. In a pinch, they turn off the heater or the air conditioner, tolerating a chill or a sweat to get another mile. And they have learned that in extreme cold, they must restrict their travels further. When temperatures dip, the normal 100-mile range can shrink to 80.

"I was shocked," said Robert Hooper, 44, a computer manager from New Jersey, when he realized how much his range shrank in the cold. When he considers the prospects of the 70-mile trip to his fiancée's house in the cold, he said, "I'm nervous."

Timothy Gill, 59, a software engineer from Maplewood, N.J., learned the hard way. With a round-trip daily commute of 85 miles, Gill figured he easily could live within the official 100-mile range of the Mini E. And he did, until the first cold snap.

His next blog entry tells the story: "Towed! After only 87.8 miles. ... Sheesh!"

Car companies staking investments on electric cars say such difficulties will be minimized soon. They say the cars, now pricey, will be manufactured more cheaply when produced in greater numbers. Battery innovations will provide greater range at lower cost. The problem of the cold will diminish as heating systems are better-developed.

Perhaps most critically, they say, public charging stations will become far more common.

There are about 117,000 gas stations in the United States. By contrast, a database of public recharging stations maintained by Tom Dowling, an electric-car enthusiast in California, lists 734 public charging stations, with the vast majority in that state.

Dowling said the comparison to gas stations isn't completely apt because most charging can be done at home. Still, the lack of public charging stations is a widely recognized hurdle for the electrification effort.

In conjunction with Nissan, a company called ECOtality has a $100 million federal grant to set up about 7,000 stations in Arizona, California, Oregon, Tennessee and Washington. More than 2,000 charging stations will be built in the Puget Sound area alone.

Given these hurdles, some automakers and environmentalists have cast a wary eye on the enthusiasts.

"I would argue that the case for the electric car is not proven," said Jim O'Donnell, chairman and chief executive of BMW North America, which built the Mini E. "Our view is: Proceed with caution."

John DeCicco, a University of Michigan lecturer and former senior fellow at the Environmental Defense Fund, said expectations for electric cars were similarly high in the 1990s, after California passed a zero-emissions mandate. "What they were saying about electric vehicles then is about what they're saying now," he said. "They were banking on battery breakthroughs then. They're still banking on them."

Nevertheless, enthusiasts remain optimistic, many hoping to lead the way to weaning the United States from foreign oil. "The car is a joy," said Gill, the Mini E driver. His new license plate: "WHY GAS."

seattletimes.nwsource.com