Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40822)	1/31/2010 11:56:18 PM
From: Peter Dierks	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Please moderate your own language so I don't have to.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40822)	2/2/2010 1:32:12 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

He was arguing against the argument you presented, even though it is not one you expressed any support for. That's a pretty normal thing to do, and one that should be pretty obvious, not one that should cause shock and strong reactions, at least not if he didn't directly say that you supported it, which he did not. If you had presented Osama bin Laden's argument about why the US should be attacked, and Peter denounced it, that would not mean he was calling you a terrorist or saying that you think the same way as OBL.