Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Jagow who wrote (24223)	11/4/1997 12:45:00 AM
From: TrueScouse	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 35569

Hi Bob: My first post in a long time after all the garbage on this thread.... There's nothing wrong with "expectations reduction" IMO. If we get a BD or Bateman report verifying, say, a total of "only" 0.20 opt of PM's under COC _and_ an economical recovery method, that would imply 10 million oz of PM's on the first sq.km. to only 100 ft. depth. I could live with that! 10 million oz of gold equivalent would be an enormous mine, and that's just for starters. It would easily justify a share price of $15, IMHO. Let's learn to walk before we can run. My risk-reward scenario for IPM hasn't changed a bit over the last couple of years..... risk = 100%, possible reward = enormous. Still waiting patiently, Howy