Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40878)	2/3/2010 8:03:45 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Voting AGAINST the most serious attempt at deficit reduction to come along in years clearly shows who is serious about reducing federal deficits.. It shows no such thing. Even assuming for the sake of argument that it really is the most serious attempt at deficit reduction in a long time, that doesn't mean its actually very serious. And even if it is a serious attempt that doesn't mean it will actually work very well, or that it won't cause harm in other ways, or make setting up a much better attempt more difficult. This attempt is seriously flawed. Its a bad thing. It should be voted against.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40878)	2/3/2010 9:19:23 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

...this is not going to work. For one thing, it's a very small percentage of the budget. It's supposed to save $250 billion over ten years, with the bulk of those savings coming in the out years, since the freeze is not indexed to inflation. That's trivial in light of an accumulated deficit of trillions over the same time period. But even then, it's not likely to work. Congress has to make this happen, and though there is a lot of wasteful government spending, virtually all of it comes attached to some motivated interest group with at least one congressman in its pocket. Moreover, this freeze is supposed to happen in an election year, when Congressman want to ship as much pork as possible to their constituents. Come to that, Obama may not be so enthusiastic about it if his poll numbers aren't good. We're going to get spending cuts when there is bipartisan consensus that they have to happen--and more importantly, what cuts should be made. Things like base-closing commissions work because there's consensus about what should be done, and congressmen just need political cover to do this. But there are deep, deep divides over taxes versus spending cuts, welfare versus defense, and so forth. Maybe if everyone's sufficiently battered by the next election cycle--and the bond markets--we'll get some real action. Until then, this is Obama's mouth writing checks that his legislature can't cash. meganmcardle.theatlantic.com