Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (3477)	2/8/2010 7:49:50 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<Heh, whats your problem is you still can't say what your specific beef was.> Again, you don't rememeber because you don't understand it... this is simply another lie now, as you've refused to go back to the beginning and find it. <No one could tell what your were talking about. > No one that doesn't understand the biotech patent issues, no. Which apparently includes YOU. If it's so cut and dried I wonder why "Mr. Market" agrees with ME and not you??? finance.yahoo.com me: <<<<and FURTHER you YOURSELF SAID you didn't believe genes were being patented!!! you: I don't know where you get that. I suspect you're twisting something to put forward an untruth. Or simply not understanding what was written.>>>> Oh, Oh... another lie in the making... not yet, because you don't understand... but soon it will be willful ignornace (again), then a lie, as you try and butt cover. Here's some of the incorrect statements you've made relating to the issue: <<If there has been no new thing developed (created is a loaded term, technically we can't create matter) there would be nothing to patent.>> Message 26289452 <<That companies patent DNA segments isn't the issue. Its whether they are patenting something "naturally occuring".>> Message 26275515 <What naturally occuring DNA has been patented? >> Message 26260364 AND of course early on you made statements clearly showing you didn't understand that cascaded into all those wasted posts and wasted time by you: Me: <<Do you think a patent should be awarded covering DNA god created (naturally occuring)? No. Though I think if there is patenting going on, its of DNA that is not naturally occuring. >> Message 26256550 Yet, although being told directly, you didn't learn ANYTHING about it... can you tell me a gene that man has created??? No... didn't think so... maybe some day, or perhaps someone has created ONE, or made an alteration here or there since I stopped looking at the topic... you let us know OK??? And let's go back to (at least used to be) the mother of all patenters, INCY: incyte.com Your job... how many of their patents fit the description you claim isn't happening??? I'll check back next week. DAK