Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus who wrote (60866)	2/8/2010 3:14:56 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217620

Is it not this country who has those sophisticated finance guys? And those are the problems that are posed? I'm correct: cashing in on it! As one does not fall in love with the stock he owns on a company, he mustn't fall in love with his brick and mortar. There are people willing to pay today 180K for that flat I told you about. I paid 32.5K end 1991. Why I had not yet cashed in on it? Because it will reach 200K to 250K in a couple of years.

To: Lazarus who wrote (60866)	2/8/2010 8:23:24 PM
From: koan	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217620

>>get a farking life!>> And see how well you like California when it is a failed statewith an inferior educational system like most of the south becaseu they do nto like ot pay taxes. People want social services, but they do not want to pay the taxes to get them. I think tax exemptions for senior citizens is reasonable, but how much they should be able to be figured out by a democatic process on an ongoing bases. If someone has 10 million dollars in real estate they should have to pay some taxs on that! Senior citizen or not. And people like you never figure out the metrics of taxes versus social services, or look at the big picture. Get a faking clue!!