Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (82406)	2/17/2010 1:22:45 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Even now, you could not continue your query and critique with out referencing an ideal. You've suggested contamination, limits of reason, incompleteness, bias, degrees of ignorance, etc which all reference something more, something complete. All inferring there is a complete ideal that simply can't be completely realized or explained by such limited beings, even those for who's nature such things are factually applicable. So you conclude we must be satisfied with some relative and subjective silhouette of foggy ideas that we know but seem unable to grasp or explain in a pure sense, and thus ultimately reject the notion of their existence all together. Have I gotten that right?