Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (28099)	2/17/2010 9:20:25 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 28931

He's back on his insane "there is no morality without Christianity" crusade. Further, he rails hypocritically directly against the teachings he espouses with his bigoted rants. He's the ultimate reductionist. dAK

To: Solon who wrote (28099)	2/22/2010 5:38:32 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I took the quote at face value. I can see that her assertion is just that, and is full of holes. Apparently I am not alone. "One example of critical attention paid to Rand by an analytic philosopher is the essay "On the Randian Argument" by Harvard University's Robert Nozick, which appears in his Socratic Puzzles. Nozick's own libertarian political conclusions are similar to Rand's, but his essay is critical of her argument. He argues that her solution to David Hume's famous is-ought problem is unsatisfactory: she asserts that preserving one's own life is objectively the highest value because it makes all other values possible, but Nozick believes she still needs to explain why a person could not rationally prefer the state of eventually dying and having no values. Thus, he argues, her attempt to deduce the morality of selfishness is essentially an instance of begging the question. Nevertheless, Nozick respected Rand as an author and noted that he found her books enjoyable and thought-provoking." spiritus-temporis.com