SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (186962)2/19/2010 1:20:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362350
 
Iran will most likely get a nuke no matter what we do -- why can't we learn to live with it...?? IMO, Iran is much more stable than a country like Pakistan that is loaded with nukes. The United States needs Obama to be forceful and say NO to any more reckless wars - and clearly tell Israel that there will be NO attacking Iran or all financial support from the United States will be in jeopardy. Stick to the sanctions against Iran and let the CIA operate behind the scene and assist elements in Iran that may want new leadership...It would be very dangerous for our country to have any troops inside of Iran...and let's remember that Iran can impact what is going on in Afghanistan and in Iraq (in a positive or negative way).



To: Rock_nj who wrote (186962)2/19/2010 5:00:24 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362350
 
OIl would surely go over $200. We cannot attack Iran that would be nuts.

It would also play right into the military dictatorships hands.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News