Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (552882)	3/3/2010 10:08:04 AM
From: jlallen	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573824

The reason why I haven't answered his question is that he has a knack for taking a serious discussion and taking it to extremes. It's essentially the tactic of reductio ad absurdum You are a master of self description...Brumar said nothing of the kind you allege...

To: RetiredNow who wrote (552882)	3/3/2010 10:15:30 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1573824

you left out polyandy does that devalue men ?? and who is devalued in group marriages ? you know lib, when three gays want to get married you will be the first one to defend them

To: RetiredNow who wrote (552882)	3/3/2010 11:44:51 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573824

OK Mindmeld, at least you draw the line somewhere. Most Americans draw the line at marriage between a man and a woman, but that sentiment is changing, especially as homosexuality is tolerated more in pop culture. Brumar is talking about the consequences of taking "equal protection" too far. That's a tactic that gay marriage advocates use all too often. To me, that's just their way of forcing their lifestyles upon the rest of society. Tenchusatsu