Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (28183)	3/6/2010 3:49:26 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

<so your playing dumb > Actually, he's not that clever and his condition is far more pathological than that. <Furthermore, I find that my ideas are too expansive to be pigeon-holed into any one box.> As has been documented countless times on several threads that statement has no meaning to Pope Greg... in fact in his little pathological world the above statement is non-sensical. In that world if there is no box, it doesn't exist. Furthermore, if any box is outside (his idea of) Christianity, then it is evil and/or inferior. DAK

To: Solon who wrote (28183)	3/8/2010 11:24:25 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<<<"The historicity of Jesus as recorded in the Gospels is beyond any reasonable doubt.">>> "There are thousands of information bits that prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that the GOSPEL JESUS did not exist." That sort of wild assertion puts you squarely in line with those on the farthest fringe of extreme atheism. Squarely at odds with virtually every credible historian that has lived in the last 2000 years and the vast majority of professional Historians both secular and religious alive today. Your usual steamroller tactics of cutting and pasting a barrage of quotes that don't say what you claim they say is all too typical and a certain sign of a weak argument.