SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (132908)3/12/2010 9:44:20 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541025
 
What did Reagan deregulate that prospered in a sustainable way? The stuff that comes to mind all crashed eventually, but maybe I am missing something.



To: slacker711 who wrote (132908)3/12/2010 9:53:12 AM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541025
 
and the fact that they didnt do it led to Reagan. It goes beyond the budget though, thirty years of steady increases in government regulation also contributed to the backlash.

Slacker, it wasn't inevitable that it led to Reagan. And a good deal of that increase in government regulation was necessary. Let's not forget that the Cuyahoga River was on fire in the 1960 from all the pollution. Air and water quality was badly deteriorating, and it was a Republican president that created the EPA and signed the original Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act. Although today's Republicans now say that he was really a Democrat, Nixon was just responding to real problems. Instead of working to construct responsible and effective regulation, the Reagan wing of the Republican Party just fought it in the name of "smaller government." This was irresponsible, has made the deficits worse than they should be, and made regulation less effective than it should be. As Obama has said more than once, we shouldn't be aiming for "smaller" or "larger" government, we should be aiming for "smarter" government. We should recognize real problems, and try to solve them intelligently.



To: slacker711 who wrote (132908)3/17/2010 12:20:29 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 541025
 
Similarly, the tax cuts and failure to reign in spending by Bush II led us to the '08 landslide by Democrats.

Failure to reign in spending was a significant factor. Tax cuts? Had he raised taxes it would have been an overwhelming landslide, and even keeping them the same would likely have resulted in the Democratic victory being larger.