Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (42169)	3/18/2010 2:31:14 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

Peter, I think we HAVE to have a THIRD PARTY in this Country. The two we've got now just "toss it back and forth". NEITHER of the two we've got now is really going to do anything as long as ALL they have to do is get 51% to the other guy's 49%. A third party could give an ALTERNATIVE and the SANE people in the country could just get together 34% of the voters and they'd be in. I LIKED Perot before he went all KOOKY. I would have voted for that guy. He was pointing out the problems we were going to have with our debt LONG before it became the issue it is today. Mitch Daniels seems to be the guy right now, but if he runs as a Republican with the SAME Republicans still there I'm not sure if he can accomplish the things he'd need to accomplish. The Republicans would just say, "Well, we won again, so it's just business as usual".