SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (242563)3/28/2010 9:45:04 PM
From: yard_manRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Climate changes -- that's not controversial -- it's the root cause that is controversial (sorry, not everyone agrees it's settled).

I know there's a correlation with increases in man-made CO2 -- but some differ on which causes which -- to be on the un"popular" side of the arguement -- does not make one a "denier"

Science rarely progresses by consensus -- and oft-times in hindsight consensus is found to be wrong. The thing is -- global warming is an issue that was found conveniently by the environmental groups that needed a new "sky is falling" theory when a lot of other BS related to population scares didn't pan out.

A more pressing issue is oil ...



To: Think4Yourself who wrote (242563)3/28/2010 9:56:18 PM
From: neolibRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
While I agree with your post, this should be 4.5By for the planet, give or take. 14By is more like the universe.

your argument about the planet being around for a long time (~ 14.5 billion years) is correct, but so what?



To: Think4Yourself who wrote (242563)3/28/2010 10:11:18 PM
From: StefanRespond to of 306849
 
Well as you said "So what?".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News